InclusionAI
availableShows if the model has enough results for an index.Ling 2.6 Flash
Ling 2.6 Flash is a non-reasoning model from InclusionAI in the Ling 2.6 family. 13 benchmarks count toward its score, in 5 categories.
IndexOverall score out of 100.37.4 ±7.0
CoverageShare of the index weight with results.75%
SpeedOutput tokens per second.104/s
Input / 1MUS dollars per 1M input tokens.N/A
Output / 1MUS dollars per 1M output tokens.N/A
ContextMaximum tokens in one request.262K
EloLMArena rating and rank.N/A
The index is a score out of 100. The ± range shows how much it can change.
CapabilitiesScore per category, out of 100.
Out of 100Results
13 counted| BenchmarkThe test name. | CategoryThe capability that the test measures. | ResultThe score from the publisher. | IndexThis result as a score out of 100. | RunThe settings of the run. | DateDate of the result. | Published byThe source of the result. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation | Agentic | 86.0% | 60.5 | — | — | Victor Barres et al. |
| Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond | Knowledge | 59.3% | 29.3 | — | — | Artificial Analysis |
| Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | Knowledge | 59.0% | 32.7 | — | — | David Rein et al. |
| Artificial Analysis IFBench | Instruction | 57.4% | 47.3 | — | — | Artificial Analysis |
| Instruction Following Benchmark | Instruction | 57.0% | 32.4 | — | — | Benchmark authors |
| Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning | Reasoning | 31.3% | 29.9 | — | — | Artificial Analysis |
| Scientific Code Benchmark | Coding | 27.0% | 36.1 | — | — | Benchmark authors |
| Artificial Analysis Coding Index | Coding | 25.3% | 36.8 | — | — | Artificial Analysis |
| Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy | Knowledge | 15.6% | 33.2 | — | — | Artificial Analysis |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | Knowledge | 14.1% | 40.0 | — | — | Artificial Analysis |
| Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam | Knowledge | 6.3% | 31.4 | — | — | Artificial Analysis |
| GDPval-AA normalized | Agentic | 0.0% | 35.6 | — | — | Artificial Analysis |
| Critical Physics Tasks | Reasoning | 0.0% | 38.4 | — | — | Artificial Analysis |
13 benchmarks count, from 13 of 13 results. A grey row does not count. Too few models took that benchmark.