LiveBench Instruction Following

Mean score over paraphrasing, simplifying, summarising and story generation, each marked on whether the stated constraints were actually met. Not in LiveBench 2.0.

ModelsModels with a result.66
Top resultBest result on this benchmark.81.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash
Top-3 spreadPoints from first to third.2.3 pts
UpdatedDate the source changed the results.25 Jun 2026

Result and cost

65 of 66 results

Results

66 results
#ModelResultThe score from the source.CostUS dollars to run one task.
01Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh effortAbove fitFar above this model's index.81.4%$0.169
02Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh effortAbove fitFar above this model's index.79.9%$0.097
03Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewhigh effortAbove fitFar above this model's index.79.1%$0.139
05Qwen3.8-Flash-NextAbove fitFar above this model's index.77.1%$0.018
13Qwen3.8 Max74.1%$0.082
14Qwen3.7 Max74.0%$0.079
15Smaug Mini73.9%$0.014
18Qwen3.8-27B72.7%$0.013
20Grok 4.671.9%$0.044
22Grok 4.571.5%$0.047
23Kimi K371.4%$0.118
24Smaug Agentic71.0%$0.105
26GPT-5.5xhigh effort70.7%$0.227
27GPT-5.4xhigh effort70.2%$0.259
31GLM-5.369.3%$0.271
31Smaug Flash69.3%$0.0073
33GPT-6 Solmax effort68.6%$0.419
38GPT-5.2-Codex66.4%$0.071
41Grok Build 0.165.2%$0.0009
50Grok 4.362.8%$0.027
53GLM-5.262.3%$0.062
54GPT-5.2high effort61.8%$0.102
58Qwen3.6 Plus58.3%$0.05
59MiniMax M357.5%$0.019
61Kimi K2.7 Code56.3%$0.047
65Qwen3.6-27B53.2%$0.046
66GLM-5.3-Flash52.8%$0.019